2019 Fashion year in review. (via @rover_thecat)
That mouse necklace!
That is a cat with a LOT of affection for the person holding the camera
found in my 4am drafts folder:
spiritually, i am a bulldozer
wait i’m not done excavating the 4am Drafts Folder
- insects don’t have their own blood so if u smoosh an insect and there’s blood inside–that’s stolen blood. externally heisted fluid
- i can honestly think of no higher Life’s Aspiration than being an pinata? hit me with wooden clubs and make me explode into confetti and candy, that’s my ideal afterlife you fruit loop
- oh you put together playlists in a certain “order,” so that they form a certain “cohesion” of attributes such as “rhythm” and “mood.” fucking weak
- the ole “toning down my personal clothing choices in order to visually pass as cishet” or as I like to call it: Incognito Mode
- *1990s jewelry advertisement voice* give her the gift that fits her perfectly. give her a cheese wheel stolen from the subterranean government cheese caves
I honestly don’t know
1/6th???? A sixth?? ONE SIXTH??? OF ALL LAND IS OWNED BY ONE PERSON ????? ¿¿¿¿¿¿¿ ؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟
i hope you have a terrible pride month if you still eat at chick-fil-a with no consideration for other lgbt people
[ID: Screenshot of an article posted under Politics tag, written by Alex Bollinger and published Wednesday, June 2, 2021
“Chick-fil-A’s profits are being used to push anti-trans state laws & kill the Equality Act
Christian billionaires like Chick-fil-A’s Dan Cathy and Betsy Devos are funding one of ‘the most sophisticated dark money operations’ to roll back LGBTQ rights.”
/End ID] x
I hope y’all choke on the next chicken sandwich you buy from them fr
CONSUMER ACTIVISM IS NOT EFFECTIVE. CONSUMER ACTIVISM IS NOT EFFECTIVE. CONSUMER ACTIVISM IS NOT EFFECTIVE. CONSUMER ACTIVISM IS NOT EFFECTIVE.
If you feel better about NOT eating there you have to equally acknowledge consumers of chik-fil-a have 0 power in what decisions Chik Fil A as a corp does.
You’re still a piece of shit. It’s not about “feeling better” it’s about not funneling money directly into legislation that strips rights away from trans people. You can yell “no ethical consumption under capitalism” until you feel better about your decisions, but you still have a moral responsibility as a human being to act in a way that does the least amount of harm possible. No, you can’t boycott most companies into changing their policies but web of corporations like Disney or GM. It’s a singular restaurant you absolutely can avoid with no harm to yourself.
You can’t avoid the harm inherent to capitalism in most transactions, unfortunately. But that doesn’t mean you can’t make meaningful changes to your own consumerism. Grow the fuck up
i dont think you get it. 1980 was twenty years ago. 1990 was 10 years ago. 2000 was 10 years ago. 2016 was two years ago. 2018 was also two years ago. 2017 was last year. 2014 was four years ago. do you understand me now?????
I thought this was my hometown for a second
So this has actually been cited by academics as part of the major draw to online spaces is the fact that just existing in public is reacted to with hostility and punishment. Gretchen McCulloch discussed this is in her book Because Internet, citing research that shows teens and young adults want to be outside! We want to spend time in social places, it’s just that there aren’t any places to exist in public without being charged for it.
there’s a big difference between “i’m sad because a character i was emotionally invested in was killed off” and “this character’s death served no purpose, was used for shock value, and is the product of bad writing and i’m upset about that”
ohboywonder
